As with any project, we started this one by watching, looking and listening. Step One was to observe three shifts to look at exactly what they were doing, when and how. After we got a handle on what was happening on the line, we could start to make improvements.
Here are a few of the things we did.
Employee Involvement Prototype. One of our areas of expertise at USC Consulting Group is a process we call the Employee Involvement Prototype (EIP). This project was a classic example of our employee involvement process and how powerful it can be.
It starts with finding proven successful operators within the organization. We sought out the employees, managers or shift bosses who were always getting the job done. We found out what they were doing right and engaged them to be part of our improvement process, part of the change going forward. Not only does it get people on board, but it provides invaluable insight into the day-to-day workings of the job.
Process improvements and standardization. We had a lot to tackle in this area because they didn’t have a strong MOS or KPIs or standard operating procedures. This is also an area that is our bread-and-butter at USCCG. We know standardization and why it is the key to efficient operations.
Just one example: The shifts weren’t keeping hourly data. If a shift was bad and didn’t produce what they were supposed to produce, they did not have the “why.” They didn’t track anything.
We saw early on that standardization would be a big part of this puzzle. Everyone had their own way of doing things. For example, different operators were changing the settings on machines based on the “it’s how we’ve always done it” principle. We needed to get everyone on the same page, and to do that, we established a standard for the machine settings that everyone was required to use.
Troubleshooting guides. A big part of working on the line with ageing machinery is how to properly troubleshoot problems as they arise, a common component in any manufacturing environment. Unfortunately, this company didn’t have many standards or how-tos for troubleshooting. Everyone had their own “hack” that might work… but often, didn’t. Sometimes one person’s “solution” would cause an issue for other shifts. Our solution was to create and standardize troubleshooting guides with pictures and steps to take to fix common problems. These were assessed by shop floor personnel and management to ensure consistency and expected results across shifts.