The client was experiencing a variety of challenges across their facilities. A project inventory audit revealed 76 projects with varying degrees of maturity across the site that needed to be defined and prioritized. This was a complex problem which required a multi-disciplined and phased approach.
The objective of the improvement program was to regain control of their operations and improve productivity and efficiency. This required the organization to establish a Project Management Office (PMO) to ensure the proper execution of projects. It also entailed making organizational changes to make sure every level of management moves in the same direction. In addition, the initiative required an overhaul of the Inbound, Outbound, and Transportation processes.
A few of the main challenges included:
Immature Stakeholder Management. The various projects did not have a clear communication plan with each of the workstreams working in silos. Cross functional efforts were not being coordinated and the success needs were not reported up to global executives. There was a complete disconnect, resulting in misunderstandings among stakeholders, team members, and departments.
Low Accountability. There were no clear task assignments. Any deadlines were not determined or ignored. The reason for change was not properly communicated, and the employees did not see projects as a priority.
Inexperienced Managers. There was no established project management culture, and the project managers in charge lacked significant experience. This resulted in an underestimation or overestimation of tasks with underestimated complexity. Plus, their resource management lacked visibility of the individuals’ workloads.
Ineffective Decision Making. There were no processes in place for problem escalation. The facilities had a culture of hiding the problem or working around it, rather than addressing the root cause to resolve the issues.
Poor Monitoring & Reporting. Any progress reporting being done was manual, cumbersome, and unfortunately inaccurate. The success criteria for the projects were not clearly defined. The KPIs were either incomplete or absent and the schedule compliance was not being tracked. Additionally, the end of project evaluation needed improvement.
Flawed Subcontractor Sourcing. The costs associated with subcontracting were significantly higher than the average market costs. Besides the elevated costs, the subcontracted management model provided limited visibility and control over operations, hindering agile decision-making and process optimization.
Inventory Discrepancies. Recurring inventory variances led to major financial losses. The flow of materials in and out of the warehouses was not being adequately monitored. The client was measuring by the truckload which allowed too much employee discretion.
The impact on the business was significant. The challenges negatively affected the client’s ability to deliver products to their customers. There was a decrease in revenue and margin erosion. Raw material shrinkage and large discrepancies were commonplace. Poor material management practices amplified discrepancies. Employees recognized many of the process and control short coming and were frustrated with the lack of management action. This had a negative impact on employee morale. And worst of all, the client’s reputation suffered in the marketplace.