Your visit, your choice

We use Clarity and Leadfeeder only with your permission. Cookie policy

International transportation and logistics provider, Logistics case study

Case study · Logistics

Logistics provider cuts transactional SG&A 24% by standardizing processes across locations

Sixty years of growth through acquisitions had left a long-time USC client with unstandardized transactional processes and no consistent way to track performance. USC helped design and install a management operating system across its locations.

Results

24%

reduction in transactional SG&A cost

35%

reduction in labor cost per revenue dollar

45%

reduction in fleet maintenance cost

Dispatch, licensing, payables and receivables costs fell 20%+.

The situation

Sixty years of growth, partly through acquisitions, had left the provider with inefficient transactional processes, missed economies of scale and no consistent way to track operational and financial performance across its business verticals.

What the assessment found

  • Transactional processes never standardized across acquired locations
  • Multiple information systems and no common reporting
  • Processes not built to scale

How the work was done

Processes: standardize the transactions

Standardized booking, dispatch, tracking, loading, delivery, payables, receivables and general ledger processes across locations, with standard transaction times.

24%

reduction in transactional SG&A cost

Monitoring: count the exceptions

Added process monitoring, quantified unscheduled events and set up performance review loops.

35%

reduction in labor cost per revenue dollar

Reporting: one platform

Built a common reporting platform with standard key performance indicators so each business vertical could be compared with the others.

Lasting impact

Lower transactional cost and faster processing continued, and the standardized, scalable infrastructure supported a major acquisition that grew the business by 40%.

Related case studies

Grew by acquisition and every location works differently?